Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of perioperative complications of bariatric and metabolic surgery / 中华胃肠外科杂志

Surgical operation in treating obesity and type 2 diabetes is popularizing rapidly in China. Correct prevention and recognition of perioperation-related operative complications is the premise of ensuring surgical safety. Familiar complications of the operation include deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary artery embolism, anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic fistula and marginal ulcer. The prevention of deep venous thrombosis is better than treatment. The concrete measures contain physical prophylaxis (graduated compression stocking and intermittent pneumatic compression leg sleeves) and drug prophylaxis (unfractionated heparin and low molecular heparin), and the treatment is mainly thrombolysis or operative thrombectomy. The treatment of pulmonary artery embolism includes remittance of pulmonary arterial hypertension, anticoagulation, thrombolysis, operative thrombectomy, interventional therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Hemorrhage is a rarely occurred but relatively serious complication after bariatric surgery. The primary cause of anastomotic bleeding after laparoscopic gastric bypass is incomplete hemostasis or weak laparoscopic repair. The common bleeding site in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is gastric stump and close to partes pylorica, and the bleeding may be induced by malformation and weak repair technique. Patients with hemodynamic instability caused by active bleeding or excessive bleeding should timely received surgical treatment. Anastomotic fistula in gastric bypass can be divided into gastrointestinal anastomotic fistula and jejunum-jejunum anastomotic fistula. The treatment of postoperative anastomotic fistula should vary with each individual, and conservative treatment or operative treatment should be adopted. Anastomotic stenosis is mainly related to the operative techniques. Stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy often occurs in gastric angle, and the treatment methods include balloon dilatation and stent implantation, and surgical treatment should be performed when necessary. Marginal ulcer after gastric bypass is a kind of peptic ulcer occurring close to small intestine mucosa in the junction point of stomach and jejunum. Ulcer will also occur in the vestige stomach after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and the occurrence site locates mostly in the gastric antrum incisal margin. Preoperative anti-HP (helicobacter pylorus) therapy and postoperative continuous administration of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for six months is the main means to prevent and treat marginal ulcer. For patients on whom conservative treatment is invalid, endoscopic repair or surgical repair should be considered. Different surgical procedures will generate different related operative complications. Fully understanding and effectively dealing with the complications of various surgical procedures through multidisciplinary cooperation is a guarantee for successful operation.

Efficacy of laparoscopic or open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors and effects of different risk level on prognosis / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic or open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and investigate effects of different risk level on prognosis.Methods The retrospective cohort study was adopted.The clinical data of 192 patients with GISTs who were admitted to Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from January 2008 to December 2013 were collected.Among the 192 patients,88 undergoing laparoscopic surgeries were allocated into the laparoscopic surgery group,104 patients undergoing open surgeries were allocated into the open surgery group.The following indicators were observed:(1) operative status:surgical procedure,operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss.(2) Status of postoperative recovery:time of gastrointestinal function recovery,time of drainage tube removal,complications and duration of hospital stay.(3) Follow-up status.(4) Prognosis of patients in different risk level.The follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to assess patients' survival,tumor recurrence and metastasis until June 2015.Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as (x) ± s and comparison between groups was evaluated by the t test.Comparison of count data was analyzed by the chi-square test.The Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw survival curve and calculate the overall survival rate and relapse-free survival rate.Results (1) Operative status:of the 88 patients in the laparoscopic surgery group,1 underwent laparoscopic wedge gastrectomy + cholecystectomy + appendectomy,6 underwent laparoscopic wedge gastrectomy + cholecystectomy,14 underwent laparoscopic assisted partial gastrectomy,67 underwent laparoscopic wedge gastrectomy.Of the 104 patients in the open surgery group,1 underwent partial gastrectomy + splenectomy,2 underwent partial gastrectomy combined with distal pancreatectomy + splenectomy,2 underwent total gastrectomy,7 underwent distal subtotal gastrectomy,7 underwent wedge gastrectomy + partial or total adjacent organ resection,8 underwent proximal subtotal gastrectomy,8 underwent wedge gastrectomy + cholecystectomy,69 underwent wedge gastrectomy.The operation time and volume of intraoperative blood loss were (105 ± 33)minutes and (43 ± 16)mL in the laparoscopic surgery group,(121 ± 52)minutes and (199 ± 81) mL in the open group,respectively,with statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (t =-2.104,2.632,P ＜ 0.05).(2) Status of postoperative recovery:the time of gastrointestinal function recovery,time of drainage tube removal and duration of hospital stay were (4.6 ± 1.8) days,(5.8 ± 2.2) days,(7.1 ± 2.9) days in the laparoscopic surgery group and (5.2 ± 1.6) days,(7.1 ± 2.8) days,(8.7 ± 4.3) days in the open surgery group,respectively,with statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (t =-2.783,-3.891,-3.078,P ＜ 0.05).Wound infection,gastric emptying delay,anastomotic leakage,lung infection and bleeding were detected in 1,3,0,0,0 patients in the laparoscopic surgery group and in 0,2,2,2,1 patients in the open surgery group,respectively,with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (x2=0.421,P ＞ 0.05).(3) Follow-up status:Of the 192 patients,149 received follow-ups.Of 88 patients in the laparoscopic surgery group,68 were followed up for an average time of 39 months.Of 104 patients in the open surgery group,81 were followed up for an average time of 51 months.During the follow-up,tumor recurrence rate in the laparoscopic surgery group and open surgery group was respectively 8.8％ (6/68) and 21.0％ (17/81),with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (x2=1.888,P ＞0.05).Postoperative 1-,3-,5 year survival rates were 98.5％,92.9％,87.4％ and 91.7％,85.2％,76.9％ in the laparoscopic surgery group and open surgery group,respectively,with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (x2 =1.967,P ＞ 0.05).(4) Prognosis of patients in different risk level:of the 149 who received the follow-up,the tumor recurrence rate of patients in low,intermediate and high recurrence risk was 7.0％ (5/71),13.6％ (6/44) and 35.3％ (12/34),respectively,with a statistically significant difference among the above indexes (x2 =14.637,P ＜ 0.05),showing statistically significant differences between low risk and high risk patients and between intermediate risk and high risk patients (x2=13.263,6.279,P ＜ 0.05),while no statistically significant difference between low risk and intermediate risk patients (x2 =0.894,P ＞ 0.05).Five-year relapse-free survival rate of low,intermediate and high risk patients was 94.2％,80.0％ and 61.8％ respectively,with a statistically significant difference (x2=13.547,P ＜ 0.05),showing statistically significant differences between low risk and high risk patients,intermediate risk and high risk patients (x2 =4.357,12.336,P ＜ 0.05),while no statistically significant difference between low risk and intermediate risk patients (x2 =0.696,P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions Compared to open resection,laparoscopic GISTs resection offers better short-term outcomes,however,the two surgical techniques offer equal long-term outcomes.Patients of high risk have poor prognosis.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma treated with radical surgery / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas (g-NECs) are rare tumors that have aggressive biological behaviors and poor prognosis, but the prognostic factors of postoperative patients with g-NEC are still unclear. Our aim was to study and explore the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with g-NEC treated with radical surgery.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinical data of 43 g-NEC patients who underwent surgery from January 2002 to January 2011 at the Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University were analyzed. Follow-up was conducted by telephone, mail, or returning visit survey.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The sizes of the 43 neuroendocrine carcinomas (G3) were 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm × 0.5 cm to 7 cm × 8 cm × 1.5 cm. Eight NECs were localized, and 35 had lymph node involvement, of which 1 also had hepatic metastasis. At the end of the follow-up, the follow-up rate was 97.7% (42/43), and the median follow-up time was 22.2 months. The median overall survival of g-NEC patients was 36.5 months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 86.0%, 51.6%, and 36.7%, respectively. Sex (P < 0.05) and lymph node involvement (P < 0.05) were prognostic factors of postoperative g-NEC patients, among which sex was an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.05), as a survival advantage of female patients over male was observed.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Most of the g-NECs were diagnosed at an advanced stage. The prognosis of g-NECs was related with sex and lymph node involvement, of which sex was an independent prognostic factor, with female patients having a survival advantage.</p>

Diagnosis and treatment of anaplastic carcinoma of the pancreas / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective To investigate the diagnosis and treatment of anaplastic carcinoma of the pancreas.Methods The clinical data of 10 patients with anaplastic carcinoma of the pancreas who were admitted to the Zhongshan Hospital from January 1999 to June 2010 were retrospectively analyzed.Computed tomography was carried out preoperatively and surgical plan was designed according to the site of tumors.Chemoradiotherapy was applied postoperatively.Patients were followed up till March 2012 by phone call and out-patient examination.The clinical and imaging features,pathological characteristics,treatment and follow-up data were analyzed.The clinical and pathological features were analyzed by descriptive statistics.The continuous data were described as (x) ± s,and categorical data were presented by frequency and precentage.Results The tumors located at the head of the pancreas were observed in 5 patients,tumor located at the neck of the pancreas in 1 patient,and tumors located at the body and tail of the pancreas in 4 patients.Two patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD),2 underwent PD + extended lymph node dissection,1 underwent PD + portal vein reconstruction,1 underwent pancreatectomy,4 underwent resection of body and tail of pancreas and splenectomy.The size of the tumors ranged from 2.0 cm × 2.0 cm × 2.0 cm to 14.0 cm × 12.0 cm × 9.0 cm.Duodenal and biliary invasion was observed in 4 patients,superior mesenteric vein-portal vein invasion in 1 patient,splenic artery invasion in 1 patient.Neural invasion was observed in 8 patients,including 4 patients with lymph node metastasis.The results of immunohistochemical staining showed that 10 patients were with positive expression of cytokeratin 7,and 1 patient was with positive expression of vimentin.Nine patients were followed up,2 patients did not receive postoperative chemoradiotherapy,6 received chemotherapy with Gemicitabine and 1 received interventional treatment.The survival time of the 9 patients ranged from 8 to 20 months,and the median survival time was 12 months.Eight patients died of tumor recurrence and metastasis.Conclusions Pancreatic anaplastic carcinoma is a distinct rare variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Pancreatic anaplastic carcinoma has high malignancy,definite diagnosis depends on pathological examination,and the surgical plan should be made according to the result of imaging examination.Conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy are ineffective for the treatment of this disease.